The impact of non-tariff measures on Australian Grains

Grain trading is a very volatile business, the days of there being structural margins and stability have somewhat disappeared, the focus now is about reducing the risk in transactions, which makes grain one of the most competitive markets to trade in.

What’s been happening with Australian production and performance?

Australian grain production is dominated by wheat and cereals. 70% of grain production is exported. Cropping returns have increased over time, with the more successful larger farms increasing their average farm size, owed to improving productivity.

However, given the competitive landscape, the only avenue to increase profits has been to increase productivity, which has been offset by decreasing prices for grains and declining terms of trade. The best performing farms have got better in increasing productivity and yield, whereas the average and below average performing farms haven’t, leading to an increasing productivity gap between the top and average performing farms.

It’s important for policy reforms which have removed impediments to structural change and innovation to understand the material impact these measures can have on productivity.

Australian Grain Production and Trade

Grain Trade Australia has a role in facilitating trade, sometimes underpinning and taking on the role of what the government would do:

  1. Setting grain trade standards in Australia
  2. Issuing trade rules and contracts to ensure confidence to commercial designs by providing legal rigour
  3. Dispute resolution services which underpin contractual arrangements
  4. Trade and market access – engaging with policy makers to ensure fair and equitable trade access to domestic and global markets
  5. Training and development to increase industry capacity by providing educational training

A recent survey on non-tariff measures (NTMs) in Australia showed that there is an increasing influence of domestic support policies in key importing countries. NTMs are increasing in number and complexity; they’re a trade policy to facilitate free trade, but need to be looked at closely to ensure protection of human and animal plant life, phytochemical residues and environmental measures. NTMs do need to be based on a risk assessment basis and objective data in order to be commercially viable and have a safe impact.

From an Australian perspective, 70% of Australia’s grain produced has to find it’s way around the world, so having competitive free trade and market access is critical to Australia’s success and the growth of the agri / grain sector. There has been a traditional shift of export destinations from exporting to the Middle East towards South East Asia, a bullish move as a result of the increasing middle class in South East Asia – Singapore, Thailand and China, owing to both the population and income growth in those markets.

NTMs certainly do have an impact on the grains industry in Australia. The GTA recently conducted research and interviewed exporters to look at the industry’s perception of NTMs and their impacts, look at trade obstacles by commodity and by market exporting to. Wheat, barley and canola are the biggest crops respectively in Australia, all affected by NTMs.

The NTMs that were most challenging were as follows:

  1. Sanitary and Phytosanitary – Taking a deeper dive, MRLs (Maximum Residue Levels) were amongst the biggest issues
  2. Technical Barriers to trade – Market access issues and getting government agreements, import permits, and a lack of transparency were some of the biggest challenges
  3. Licensing Quotas Prohibitions and Quality Controls
  4. Price Control Measures e.g. taxes and charges
  5. Finance Measures
  6. Government Procurement Measures

To industry, it was seen that NTMs are a huge burden on compliance cost risk, higher operational and commercial risk, risk of trade bans or trade restrictions and a lack of confidence by industry to invest in developing production capacity. Confidence issues causes increased cost to be priced, adversely impacting the farmer or end customer, which makes trading less competitive and more challenging.

Some of the global grains challenges within Australia are also global. Food safety is at the top of these challenges, it’s important to diverge and tighten MRLs. Biotechnology is an opportunity but also challenge in Australia, where policies are often based on a zero tolerance or heavily reduced basis. Regulation of biotech products or new innovations should be based on science and risk assessment. Sustainability for grain traders is also important. Sustainability issues in Australia need to be addressed, based on science as well as societal expectations.

To conclude, trade and market access requires a multi-faceted approach by both farmers and consumers to tackle some of the challenges and risks as mentioned earlier. Through international protocols and agreements in policy, advocating governments to work closely together as well as build international partnerships within the sector, as well as bodies supporting regulators, decision makers and governments / constituents to ensure the right decisions are made in respect to the global trading of grain.

It’s important to recognise the technical regulations and safety / security around NTMs, but it’s also critical to encourage forward-looking policies in free trade agreements to minimise non-tariff measures. Quantifying the impact of NTMs across difference commodities well help manage some of the issues around NTMs and updating favourable policy.

What’s been important for Australia in terms of competitiveness, challenges and trends?

Australia is focussed on 5 key streams to combat competitiveness, increasing yield and productivity in the agricultural sector:

  1. Markets for farm inputs and outputs
  2. Technology development and uptake
  3. Structural change
  4. Society’s expectations of farmers
  5. Climate change

Graph: climate adjusted productivity for Australia, Source: ABARES

Climate change is significant and concerning for Australian farmers. Because climate is changing so significantly over time, producers are required to adjust productivity. The climate is becoming less favourable for Australian farmers which has caused a new slowdown in productivity growth.

However, under wet and dry conditions, farmers respond differently to shocks and changes in climate over time, and surprisingly, farmers have focused on improving productivity during dry years and this adaptation has increased as a result of reacting to new trends quickly.

Want more news updates?

Why not subscribe to our latest news and blogs for free?

Subscribe now